Return to Uncreativelabs.net front page Uncreative Labs
PC XT and AT forums
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

 Persistant Cache on hard disks? View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
Puckdropper
Site Admin


Joined: 02 Oct 2004
Posts: 766
Location: Not in Chicago

PostPosted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:33 am Reply with quoteBack to top

Are there any hard disks out there that have a persistent cache? Rather than using RAM for a cache, the drive would use a flash or other type of memory chip that stores data when power's off. This would reduce the need for the drive to spin up to read and write recently accessed files. By keeping the hard disk off, much power could be saved which would mean better battery life.

I've been getting about an hour of battery life out of my laptop recently, as my workflow tends to involve saving *often*. I rarely write more than 80 characters before it's time to save. (I'm working on programming, sometimes it's just a matter of typing a line of code, compiling, and trying something else.)

I'm planning on using a thumb drive next time to see if I can get better battery life.

_________________
>say "Hello sailor"
Nothing happens here.

>score
Your score is 202 (total of 350 points), in 866 moves.
This gives you the rank of Adventurer.
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's websiteAIM AddressYahoo MessengerMSN MessengerICQ Number
ryan



Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 261
Location: WisConSin

PostPosted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:05 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Quote:
Are there any hard disks out there that have a persistent cache? Rather than using RAM for a cache


No, but not a bad idea. There are of coarse reasons, flash ram actually cannot read/write as quickly as the drive can access data now that we are finally bumping the 166mhz transfer rate. (if it could be made to do so on both read and write it would be very expensive)

Also many drives actually use cache (aka srams) to cache which require very little logic, flash of coarse has overhead.

Patent and submit your idea to a company, to be honest a hybred drive sounds like an excellent niche product. Get about a 2gb-8gb cache size so that most everything you normally use is always on the cache so the drive almost never has to spin on. Then change the drive logic so the drive can access data while spinning up and increase the spin up time soo it requires less juice.

And yes a thumb drive if you can boot off it would definately save a LOT of battery life. If you had your bootables on a flash drive and other stuff on a non flash laptop drive that could be setup to shutoff quickly when not in use you could get away with something sort of like you describe without a special hd.

Good Luck
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic
 Jump to:   
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001/3 phpBB Group :: FI Theme :: All times are GMT